🔗 Share this article

Tehran is prepared to resume nuclear negotiations with the United States as long as it is handled with "respect" and "honor", Iran's foreign minister has announced.

Abbas Araghchi stated exclusively dialogue was effective, and disclosed recent overtures had originated from mediators to reopen discussions with the American leadership. He asserted Iran possessed no unreported enrichment locations, and Iran had not yet reached a point to authorize the global atomic watchdog to inspect struck enrichment centers for safety concerns.

Navigating a Difficult Course

The foreign minister is navigating a challenging route since Iran wishes not to appear to be acting from a stance of vulnerability, and he emphatically stated that Iran had emerged more resilient defensively and emotionally from the coordinated strike on its nuclear sites in June.

He was speaking at a strategic meeting in Tehran where he reiterated that Iran had "a fundamental entitlement to process nuclear material on home soil that it will perpetually retain" – the main reason of the impasse in the earlier negotiations.

Prior Discussions Abruptly Terminated

The earlier sessions of talks between the US and Iran were brought to an abrupt and bitter end on 12 June when Israel, with American backing, attacked Iranian nuclear sites in a 12-day war that concluded with Donald Trump claiming the facilities had been destroyed. Afterward, Western states exercised their authority to reinstate global restrictions, but Iran maintains they have not had a substantial consequence.

Perfect Agreement Offered

Tehran representatives stated they felt they had reached a "magic solution" to the nuclear fuel concern in previous talks, when it was agreed an Iran-based consortium with Washington's engagement could refine atomic fuel. The two nations would have been able to assert triumph since home-based processing would have remained and the US could be assured that Iran's atomic project was entirely non-military.

It had not been agreed in the talks that American atomic experts could work inside Iran, but that was a reasonable assumption of the consortium proposal. Representatives stated three times they had secured an understanding with Washington's diplomat Steve Witkoff only for the agreement to disintegrate due to "opponents in the US".

Existing Situation

Tehran representatives said the cooperative arrangement was now withdrawn, but it seems very probable the proposal could be revived in various formats if talks restart.

The US president last week claimed he had been getting signals that Iran desired to restart talks, but privately Iranian officials say they are not yet getting clear proposals from the United States either directly or from important Middle Eastern intermediaries, such as the Qatari government, Egypt, the Omani authorities and the Saudi kingdom. The Iranian foreign ministry has been charged of non-responsiveness in the wake of the US president's straightforward manner, but Tehran says negotiations is not part of a spectacle.

Political Stance

In his speech to the forum, aimed to paint the US as a hegemonic power that abuses the concept of worldwide standards, the foreign minister declared the two-week conflict revealed the dispute could not be settled by armed force. He asserted the attacks started with a US demand for an total Iran submission and concluded with an complete request for a halt to hostilities.

Iran is assured the first strikes by Israel were executed with total Washington understanding and coordination, making faith difficult to reestablish.

Negotiations Remains the Primary Solution

Araghchi stated: "It was not Iran that had abandoned diplomacy; it was the United States and the western countries that had consistently tried to dictate their will during the negotiations. Dialogue can still be alive and remains the final solution to address disputes, but its standards, rules and tenets must be adhered to."

"If they speak to the nation of Iran with the tone of dignity and respect, they will obtain a answer in the same tone."

Repair and Rebuilding

In what is portrayed by Iranian officials as the conflict of repair and rebuilding, Araghchi stated he was confident Iran's military capacities "are much stronger than before 13 or 14 June of this year. Every aspect of our defense have been rebuilt. We learned many lessons from this war; we have identified our own weaknesses and the weaknesses of the adversary."

He stated: "We managed to survive this war. Our enrichment knowledge, which they aimed to destroy, continues to exist. The sites and machinery, if destroyed, will be reconstructed; what is essential is the determination of the citizens of Tehran and then the unity of the country that they sought to undermine, but were unable to shatter. The nation of Iran have developed more resilient, more united, and more backing of the government and the nation in the wake of this assault."